Megan Markle's sister begins against the Duchess the new war

Despite the decision of the judge to reject the next claim without the right to file a new one, Samantha Markle and her lawyers are not going to lower her hands and want to force Megan to answer for their words. 59-year-old Samantha Markle, the Duchess of Sussex by the Duchess of Sussex, intends to continue the fight against Megan Markle, which he accused of slander, and again go to court.

According to her, Prince Harry's wife, during a scandalous interview with Opri Winfrei in 2021 and in the Harry and Megan television series in December 2022, displayed it by an unprincipled person, Evening Standard reports. The woman appeals to a court decision that rejects her claim that Megan has shown her as "a false, racist, glory search", destroying her sister's image "publicly and global.

" Such words have led to the fact that Samantha could still not work or even enjoy everyday things, such as a hike to a grocery store, without condemnation. In March, Judge Florida Charlin Edwards Ganivel said that Mrs. Markle "could not state any statements that could confirm the defense claim. " It was rejected with a bias, which meant that it could not be reappeared. However, Samantha's legal team is determined to bypass this decision.

Her lawyers claim that Judge Ganivel did not take into account the slander, which is meant, created by silent facts. The March decision was deprived of Megan from the trial, which was supposed to be in court in the tape in November. The saamant requires at least $ 75 thousand for defamation. In an interview with the former actress, she said that she grew up the only child. Megan also stated that Samantha changed her name back to Markle only after she, Megan, began to meet Harry.

According to Samantha, her sister made similar statements in the Netflix series, and these accusations have suffered her "humiliation, shame and hatred on a worldwide. " In her 58-page resolution, Judge Ganivel reported that Megan's statements cannot be defamatory, since they "are essentially true on the basis of evidence noticed in court" or "cannot be considered slander.

" The judge came to the conclusion that Megan's comments about her childhood were her "just thought" that she had no close relationship with Samantha, and Samantha's assertion that Megan "meant that (she) was a liar and a search Glory ", called" the wrong distortion "what the Duchess said. Returning to Megan's statement that Samantha changed her name from Rasmussen, her name after her husband, back to Markle after the Duchess began to meet Harry, the judge said that "the essence was correct.

" "The fact that the plaintiff used one name and then the name Markle shortly after the report of the defendant's relationship with Prince Harry was published is essentially correct, based on evidence in the protocol that the court took into account in court" , - the decision reads.

"The plaintiff's claims will be rejected with bias because she could not specify any statements that could confirm the slander or defamation of the content, until now, her third attempt to change her complaint or in the book" In search of freedom "or in The Netflix and Megan Netflix series, no in an hourly TV interview with the defendant and her husband on CBS, "the judge summed up.

Samantha also planned to ask Kate Middleton to give a testimony before Princess Welsh reported that she had cancer. Samantha Peter Tiktin's lawyer was convinced that the princess would be able to give useful testimony in court. "I felt that Catherine could shed a very important light on what happened, because it is obvious that something was really wrong between the two," he said.