Chicago Mafia in the Kremlin: what he understood Obama about Russia and why sat in 2014 in 2014

Why did Barack Obama in 2014 sat with his hands and did not counteract the annexation of Crimea? This rhetorical question is asked by journalist Viktor Schlinchak, starting from the book of the Expatient Promised Land, from which it is clear: the author already understood everything about the Russians . . . I remember very well how Obama became president. The US Embassy organized a large banquet in Hayati on the Election Day and collected Ukrainian Vippets, Journalists, Analysts.

"Change" - it sounded fresh, reminiscent of the Rukh "needed changes", and Obama, unlike the Republican McCain, was perceived as hope for the world. This is then, when in the second cadence, Obama was quite restrained with the capture of the Crimea Russians, his sympathy in Ukraine was very shaky. There is a legend that McCain just demanded that Obama introduce American destroyers into the Black Sea to protect Ukraine from Russian aggression, but . . .

But Obama wrote several books that are even worth attention today. When you are not in power, it is much easier to look at certain things. "A Promised Land" (2020) is one of these books that deserves careful reading. Just the day he flipped her again. And then even here, at the FB, he saw a sign quote, which he even once emphasized. Here it is: "I cannot understand the Russian character. I have met with Russian politicians many times.

The Russian brazenly lies and looks into your eyes and knows that you see this lies and he is not ashamed at all. Lies - this is exactly what pursues the Russian power everywhere. Interesting. The "Great Depression" in America It arose as legitimate methods of its activity. There is no diplomatic language for Russian politicians at all, there is a pressing against the wall and the language of "their concepts".