$ 100 billion in Crimea. What does not understand Trump that wants to give the peninsula to the occupiers

When they say that Crimea is not Ukrainian, it is useful to remember how much Ukraine has spent on it. The analyst Anatoly Amelin makes the simplest calculations - and it turns out that after the transfer of the Peninsula from the RSFSR in 1954, he has invested more than $ 100 billion. Did you know that Crimea has cost Ukraine (USSR) almost $ 100 billion? It was evicted 200,000 indigenous population and imported (including occupation time) of more than 1. 5 million Russian -speaking population.

Those who shout that Crimea has been "presented" for forgetting not only about the seizure of thousands of hectares of fertile lands in Ukraine, but also about huge investments made by Ukraine in rescue and development of the Crimea economy. … According to historians, more than 200,000 people were deprived of those events with the transfer of the territories of the RSFSR. Of these, half are Ukrainians. As well as more than 40 thousand square meters. km of the territory. For comparison.

The area of ​​Crimea is 27 thousand km square. In money, this is still important: according to the 1926 census, about 4. 5 million Ukrainians lived in the territories of the RSFSR adjacent to the USSR. … Now to the expenditures of Crimea. I am not a historian, but here I could find in public sources. The transfer of the Crimean region from the RSFSR to the USSR was made on the basis of a decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of February 19, 1954.

The need for transmission was officially explained by the "community of economy, territorial closeness and close economic and cultural relations between the Crimean region and the Ukrainian SSR. " In the post -war period, Crimea was in a difficult economic situation - agriculture declined, industry is destroyed, demographic situation is complicated by the deportation of the Crimean Tatars. Projects: 1.

The North Crimean Channel (1961-1975) The largest infrastructure project was the construction of the North Crimean Channel-the irrigation and farming system of 402. 6 km long for the supply of Dniprovsk water to the arid regions of Crimea. The cost of the project: 7 large irrigation systems were created in the canal zone: Krasnoperekop, Dzhankoy, Soviet, Razdolnensk and others. The channel provided 80-87% (!) The volume of water intake for the peninsula by 2014. 2. Simferopol TPP/DRES: 3.

SES-5 solar power plant in Shcholkkin: 4. Agricultural restoration. Investments in the development of agriculture, in particular, riching, had a significant economic effect. Thanks to the functioning of the North Crimean Channel, the net profit from cultivation of rice was: together for 5 years: 33300000 rubles. (about $ 400- $ 450 million in modern equivalent). 5. Construction of tourist infrastructure.

Creation of a spa network (1950-1980's): development of campaigns and routes Hotel Complex "Tourist" (1980) 6. Modernization of transport infrastructure. … The total investment in the development of Crimea during its stay in the USSR/Ukraine was, according to various estimates, from $ 50 to $ 105 billion in modern equivalent. This amount includes: I will also remind that more than 200,000 Crimean Tatars were forcibly evicted by the Soviet invaders.

Other nationalities of the USSR in Crimea were relocated about 800 thousand people. According to some estimates, up to 1 million people have been relocated from the moment of occupation to Crimea. This explains the "Russian -speaking" population of the occupied Crimea. This is also the post that the royal muzzle (Trump), who wanted to give the Zemsky parish (Crimea) to the occupiers, and did not understand the context closely.