Will the Russians undermine the Kakhovsk hydroelectric power station and that will then be

"Russian invaders threaten to blow up the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station in the event of a new kakhovka. Opinion. We. We from Ukraine have such a manner of Russians - intentionally to show what they are inadequate and unpredictable to intimidate the environment. Although as a result, they only confirm how short they are. The Russians were posted in open sources of video blasting the bridge at the Kakhovski hydroelectric power station during the escape.

Why did they do it? To show how much they are afraid of the Armed Forces to move to the left bank or… or to hint that they can blow up the dam itself? It is likely that the second one for them was much more priority than just document the destruction of communal property, which we will restore their money from reparations.

After all, it was under this video that now they have been talked about that Russian invaders in the event of a threat to the release of a new Kakhovka can land a dam, gateway or everything at the same time. Well . . . Here is interesting. Underwatering the bridge and blowing a dam is two big differences. To demolish the dam, you need a total charge within 0. 3-0. 5 kilotons, or even more, which can be compared to the gravity.

But even if so, what are the consequences of this? The main flooding will fall on the Left Bank, and on the part where the occupiers are hysterically arranging the lines of defense - the first, the second, the third . . . possibly hysterics and the fourth will soon begin to equip.

And if they do it, then 15-20 BTGR will successfully take swimming for the horizon, and the Armed Forces will go to the left shore with the possibility of expanding the bridgehead immediately along the line from Skadovsk to Lower Syrogoz-Mikhailivka-Tokmak. And this, for its part, is the actual loss of the whole half -day in the short term. What is the loss of occupied territories by the Russians in the short term, we already know everything.