Intimidation and reputational bottom: Ukraine's tops reacted to replace the nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation
There will be no strokes that there is a lack of reaction to fighting in the Kursk region. The focus gathered the reactions of Presidential Office Volodymyr Zelensky, as well as other politicians, political scientists and military. On the evening of September 25, a meeting of the Russian Council was held, which announced a change in the Russian nuclear doctrine. After that, Roszma published the main proposals of President Vladimir Putin.
It follows that Moscow can use nuclear weapons against a non -nuclear country. In addition, the assistance of nuclear countries is not nuclear to blows in the Russian Federation will be considered an attack on Russians and will lead to nuclear response. The Kremlin also took care of Belarus: the blows on it are also forbidden. Presidential Head Andriy Yermak wrote in Telegram-channel that there was a single argument in Russia to influence the West.
This argument is nuclear weapons and the Kremlin has no other tools. The adviser to the head of the OP Michael Podolyak explained on the air of the Telelorphone that Nuclear statements of Moscow are a sign of the cowardice of the Russian Federation. The Russians used all possible types of weapons against Ukraine, did not win and now invented the "last argument".
"This is a completely reputational bottom, it is obvious that the Russian Federation does not understand how to stop what will continue in this war," he said. The head of the Center for Combating Misinformation at NSDC Andriy Kovalenko stated in Telegram that nuclear threats were talking about the fear of Ukraine's weapons. The Armed Forces weapons can destroy weapons stocks, and to prevent this from happening, the Kremlin has launched a new blackmail series.
He also mentioned the test of the carrier carrier of the Sarmat nuclear warhead, which was preceded by Putin's speech. The failure of the test, which ended with a 62-meter bondage, was written by the official. People's Deputy Alexei Goncharenko reminded how Ukraine hit 107 arsenal of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation in Toropka and about control of the Armed Forces above 1 300 square meters. km of Kursk region. After such actions, there were no nuclear strikes.
In his opinion, Goncharenko "takes on the pon" and this should not be afraid. The military observer and editor of the "military focus" Igal Levin explained that the change of nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation testifies to the fear of strokes of Ukraine at "strategic depth". In his opinion, the Armed Forces should not expect a positive decision of the event on restrictions on long -range weapons: it is necessary to beat, "without waiting for approval.
" Russia is threatening, bluffing, so Ukrainians need to put partners before the fact, wrote the entertainment. Political scientist Alexei Holobutsky, meanwhile, analyzed the content of the changes that Moscow made into nuclear doctrine. In his opinion, Russians can now assume that in their territory it is impossible to shoot any kind of weapons at all. The basis for the discharge of the atomic bomb can be events that they "do not like".
Among other things, the Kremlin tries to protect against the long -range weapons of Ukrainian partners, from the long -range weapons of the Armed Forces, from strikes for military purposes and from attacks on infrastructure. The reaction of the Deputy Commander of the 3rd OSHBA of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Maxim Furbalan also appeared.
The military explained that the change in the nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation does not mean that the Kremlin is really ready for the discharge of the atomic bomb. In his opinion, the new statement of Moscow should scare the event and partners will not abolish the restrictions on long -range weapons. Publications have appeared in a number of Western media on changes in the nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation.
In particular, this was written in The Washington Post, Le Monde, France 24, The Times of India, Reuters. It should be noted that on September 22, the edition of WP analyzed the new red lines that Russia could draw. At the same time, analysts mentioned that previous nuclear threats of the Russian Federation were heard too often and did not end with anything.