Trump is tired of Putin: How did the White House policy change against the Kremlin
It is worth noting that Ukraine's military and technical support did not stop for a day, despite the relevant statements of the White House and media reports. It is about the exchange of intelligence and other military and technical cooperation. Currently, the United States pursues a policy of actual isolation of the Russian Federation in the post -Soviet space. These are, in particular, events in the Caucasus. The peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
This is a position on Kazakhstan, which is the country of City. It is noteworthy that Kazakhstan actually started an increase in oil production contrary to the decisions of the OPEC countries. Which led to a fall in price and, accordingly, to multibillion-dollar losses. These are events in Belarus, Moldova and more. In the concept of these actions of the United States, the key role is given to Ukraine. At the moment, the weakening of the Russian Federation.
Because even if you analyze the successful strokes of the Ukrainian defense forces for oil refining enterprises, as well as for legitimate military purposes in the territory of the Russian Federation, it would not be impossible without exchange of intelligence, and it would be impossible.
I note that the White House is consistent in its policy, even during the unfolding of the roddow in the United States (suspension of the work of part of state structures), which can theoretically affect the course of military-technical cooperation with Ukraine. I emphasize, it is necessary to pay attention not to the statement, but to the actions of Washington. The release of the nuclear arsenal in the UK for the first time since 2008.
The redeployment of atomic nuclear boats to the shores of Russia. B-2 strategic bombers over the head of the Russian dictator during his visit to Alaska to meet with Trump. The deployment of navy navy p-8 POSEIDONA, designed to perform pro-cotnial, air and intelligence missions, occurs in northern Europe at a time when NATO enhances its defense in the Baltic region against the background of Russian threat underwater cables and pipelines and pipelines.
The constant deployment of US military forces in support of NATO, including destroyers, who worked near the Russian Arctic region at the end of August, follows a sharp change in President Donald Trump's position on the Russian-Ukrainian war. In addition, the United States is now a modern aircraft carrier, allowing the Russians to clearly understand the further development of events both at the moment of escalation of tension in the Baltic Sea and in the airspace of Europe.
That is, the statement that the United States has not changed the nature of practical actions against Russia is absolute nonsense. It is a candid information duck running Western media, I do not exclude that from the easy hand of the Russian special services. Regarding the US further actions to support Ukraine, intelligence exchange is constantly being exchanged. I emphasize again - 24/7 online.
In addition, the United States expand the nomenclature of means of defeat of American production, in particular for blows in the territory of Russia. In particular, Eram rockets with a range of 450 km. But the main thing is their number, which will be transmitted to Ukraine - 3300. That is, compared to ATCMS missiles, the range of 300 km lesions is a revolutionary breakthrough.
It is possible to transfer Tomahawk missiles or Barracuda, which is slightly smaller than the lesion, is a serious argument for the coercion of the Russian Federation to peace. The United States did not just change rhetoric against the Russian Federation, they moved to gross military-political pressure. Calling Russia the "paper tiger", Trump made it clear to its role on the world geopolitical map. Quite clear humiliation.
Trump clearly said, "I'm tired of Putin, from his failure to fulfill his promises. " And if so, accordingly, not only rhetoric changes, but also the specifics of affairs. At the same time, I warn Ukrainians on the expectation of rapid changes at the front at the expense of receipts of American weapons. You should not expect another wunderwaffe (miracle weapons), Tomahawk missiles will not. Yes, they will significantly weaken the logistics, energy capabilities of the occupier country.