Other

Russia is pressing, Ukraine counterattack: what the overall situation on the front in the summer of 2024 looks like

Military observer Ivan Kirichevsky analyzes the general situation at the front and the state of war. It draws attention to five points, the understanding of which will allow you to keep faith in victory and not exaggerate what the Russians are achieved. As for the situation on the front in general.

- Now the Russian army aims not so much to take any specific geographical boundaries as to show to itself, to us and the world in general, that it is still capable, as they are called, "fixed realities to the earth. " It should be noted that the activation of Russian attackers on the front to the new "offhand" indicators (sometimes up to 170 clashes per day) began after Putin has publicly put forward inadequate territorial claims as one of the conditions for negotiating.

Accordingly, our army on the front is now a mirror task - to show us, the Russians and the world that the army of the Russian Federation cannot "fix the realities on earth. " This message does not diminish the importance of the combat work that our soldiers and officers now lead, just on the contrary - this message from me emphasizes that the importance of their combat work is now for the future now.

- It is necessary to pay attention not only to reports on the promotion of the army of the Russian Federation in the East, but also that our troops also have successful counterattack, for example, in the Volchansk and Serebryansky forestry area. Any news about the promotion of the Russian army, especially now, should be given with the clarification of context, that is, that this success can give the enemy, how it can affect the situation.

Yes, it looks time -consuming, and it is sometimes very difficult to contain a detailed explanation in the airtime format of our media, but it must be done. Otherwise, the presentation of facts without explanation will finally bring our fellow citizens to the inability to overcome the entropy barrier, and if simple, everyone will simply "swim".

- For half a year, we did not have regular military support from the United States as the most powerful state of the West, it was impossible to block from other sources. Such a lag in order to make up for the same half a year, that is, at least by October - November, the effect is achieved when the Russian army has really slowed and not moving forward.

It was a block of explanations for compatriots, who still think that the very fact of restoring the supplies of assistance from the United States should stop the aggressor, as in that anecdote-"goods of flags, asanavitier pozd!-Eyezd, on a standing stand, once or two!". - Regarding the supply of equipment and weapons for the Defense Forces of Ukraine, unfortunately, the configuration has not changed since 2022.

That is, if you consider that the officially declared number of SUU is more than 1 million "bayonets", in order to meet our needs, one must literally "undress" the US army for all the available weapons, let them go naked-bossy. Literally, they have about 2. 5 thousand Abrams tanks and 1. 2 thousand "Bradley", then we need everything. And somehow it turns out that in the US Army only 100 Abrams and 125 Bradley can be in the United States, and our army received about 300 Bradley and 31 Abrams.

And so with such a kucim set we had to finally defeat Russia on the battlefield, no more and no less. On the other hand, it should be understood that we are dependent on external supplies even small arms and ammunition for it. And if you summarize the capacity of the MIC of the Western countries for the production of new weapons, there is still very little for our needs.

- Against this background, too many Western analysts allow themselves to suggest that Ukraine would still go into a new large -scale counterfeit, and there are equipment and weapons from the previous one. Against this background, outline them live on the slight - the most political corrective form of answer that can be afforded. The author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position. The author is responsible for published data in the "Thought" section.