The Armed Forces are ramdowned

For the destruction of reconnaissance drones of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, it is better not to use FPV-punks based on copter, but drones-interceptors of aircraft type, experts say. The Defense Forces of Ukraine have repeatedly destroyed the reconnaissance drones of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation of "Orlan-10" and ZaLA using FPV-pans. However, the use of FPV-aroma as anti-aircraft agents has some disadvantages, told the Analytical Portal of Defense Express.

The first difficulty is to identify the goal. Existing methods of detection of UAVs, including radar stations and radio electronic intelligence, require a certain saturation of means and coordinated actions. In addition, to intercept the Russian UAV, the Ukrainian operator must notice the target, having a camera not of the best quality and in the conditions of possible obstacles.

If after detection of the target as a means of counteraction, the FPV-Dron was chosen, then it should be taken to the desired height and course. The publication noted that FPV-pans based on quadcopters have a very limited flight time-from 10-12 to 30 minutes. In the case of reconnaissance drones, this time will be spent to raise the device to the desired height and start the event on the target, which you may need to be persecuted.

In this case, "Orlan-10" can be reconnaissance at a height of 2-3 km, but more often descends lower due to poor quality of cameras and weather conditions. This UAV has a speed of 110 km/h and not every FPV digter, which carries a health load at high altitude, will be able to move at the same speed.

In view of this, analysts of the publication have come to the conclusion that it is better not to intercept Russian intelligence drones not by Kamikadze copter, but by aircraft-type interceptors, which have a higher speed and can stay in the air longer. Experts also analyzed the experience of the US and Iran on the control of UAVs with drones.

Yes, the project of the American Raytheon called Coyote, which began with the creation of an anti-aircraft drone-interceptor of container launch, quickly turned into a version of the Coyote 2C into a full-fledged anti-aircraft missile with a jet engine, but with a permanent speed and head. Regarding the Iranian barge of the 358 anti -aircraft missile, it is considered that it has an optical electronic system to identify a self -power target.

In both cases, it was not without the function of homing. "The emergence and development of" machine vision ", which allows you to create fairly cheap heads of homing, it may well be an interesting direction for experiments," - summed up experts. We will remind, on May 30 on the network there was a video where the Ukrainian military destroyed the Russian reconnaissance drone Zala 421-16e with the help of an FPV-arom.