Other

Return the ZEP, stop beat on energy: four points of transit ultimatum of

Economist Volodymyr Omelchenko knows the way to force Russia to leave the Zaporozhye NPP and stop beat on Ukrainian energy. You just need to relate these issues to the transit of Russian (or Azerbaijani, which is the same) gas through the territory of Ukraine. Continuation of contracts for transit of Russian gas (oil) in the context of the return of Zaporizhzhya NPP under the control of Ukraine. 1.

Ukraine became the first country in Europe to maximize dependence on Russian gas, oil, oil and nuclear fuel and was able to get rid of its diversification by 100%. All EU countries, which are now dependent on Russian gas, are also able to do it as soon as possible. 2. Russia earns more money from the supply of hydrocarbons than Ukraine receives from the provision of services for its transit. Therefore, the balance of interests in this matter is clearly in favor of the Russian Federation.

Not only does it receive about 15 billion euros to the war annually from gas and oil supplies, it also has a political impact on the country's dependent on Russian energy. 3. Azerbaijan does not have the resources to ensure the fulfillment of the current contractual obligations to supply its gas to the EU and Turkey simultaneously with the additional use of the Ukrainian transit corridor.

There is also no gas conductive route for the transportation of Azerbaijani gas to the border of Ukraine, which bypasses the territory of the Russian Federation. Actually, the only option of finding such a resource is to re -export the same Russian gas. 4.

The arguments that Ukraine's transit contract with SOCAR is necessary for the Russian Federation to be contained from rocket and drone blows on the gas transmission system of Ukraine, they do not withstand criticism, since the armed forces of the Russian Federation throughout the large -scale aggression are constantly attacked. 5. The minimum conditions for the extension of transit contracts should be: the author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position.