Beat all over Russia: why in the near future the US will take off its next ban
The White House today - more than ever - is interested in the effectiveness of the Ukrainian army, which is why numerous "prejudices" are hindered by American politicians. Therefore, common sense is gradually displacing this infamous fear of "escalation of the conflict": without a significant defeat on the battlefield, the bunker will not sit at the negotiating table with sober ambitions.
"The Americans will do the right thing after they have tried all other options," said Sir Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of Great Britain. Less than a month ago, the United States allowed the Armed Forces to be fired by Russian weapons, now Washington is convinced - the restriction must be removed: this logic follows from the "American vision of the Victory Strategy of Ukraine", the contours of which were voiced the day before.
What it will change: before the new offensive in Kharkiv region, the Russians accumulated tens of thousands of soldiers near the border with Ukraine in May. However, Ukrainian defenders could not hit them with Western weapons, since Kiev did not receive such permission from our partners.
Military analysts write that the June permission of the USA gave its results to the border of the Russian Federation: the enemy's offensive in Kharkiv region fades, the dynamics on the Northeast Front almost immediately changed, and the Ukrainian troops managed to stabilize the situation there. But the offensive of the racists in this area would not be if the Armed Forces received a "partial permit" a half or two months ago.
It is quite predicted that shelling of the Russian border did not cause any escalation by the Kremlin. It is an incentive for partners to increase their assistance and move to the following prohibitions: "short" shelling "of the frontal zones of the Russian Federation will not allow to disrupt large -scale operations of Russia.