The tragedy in Chernihiv reminded that Ukraine is a victim. Why can't the brain be switched off when you deal with Russia

It is especially unacceptable during the war because the price is too high. Especially for those who take responsibility. Is it permissible to allow Ukraine to blame Ukraine? Of course not. Recently, Potato Usurpator Lukashenko gave another "branded" interview, accusing Ukraine that Russia has started the war. Putting guilt not only to Zelensky and Poroshenko, but even getting Kuchma. This is reminiscent of the accusation of a woman who beaten by Abjuzer, that she is guilty of being beaten.

And so rural relatives gather and begin to tell what she and how she did wrong. But the truth is that it is the nature of Abuizer - to beat, and whatever it does, it would still find reason for violence. And so that she does not do further, no matter how spiritually grows over herself (the recommendation of Arestovich's expert), he will still continue to beat her. Until it leaves. Therefore, only Russia is guilty of Russia against Ukraine.

And the only question that can be asked is the question "And did we do everything to prepare for aggression that was inevitable?" Is Russia guilty that it struck the theater in Chernihiv and killed civilians there? Of course, it is guilty. But did the organizers include the brain and think that such an event would be very likely to be a goal for Russian rockets? Especially if they are constantly telling that drones are a weapon of victory? The Russians kill innocent people. This is a fact.

And that's what we know. This is a condition of the task. The Russians are able to hit the city center, killing civilians. This is another fact. And it must be taken into account. It is unacceptable to ignore it. It's a crime. Is it reasonable to hold an event that will accurately attract the attention of Russian terrorists, in the center of the city, which is poorly protected by air defense and what is the current time for one minute? The question is rhetorical. And it's about responsibility.

And he smokes very much when people who took responsibility are justified by arguments such as "could be hidden" and "a specific place was not reported in advance and reported only by registered audited participants a few hours before the event.

" This is serious? That is, you seriously think that if the Russians were interested in such a public event, would they not find a way to find out? I do not even know that it is worse, that such an argument is used as an excuse, considering everyone for idiots, or if they really believe in such safety measures. And about the alarm to which they would react. Aha. In the course of time in one minute. And knowing that people mostly do not respond to air anxiety.

And not the question whether it is or not. This is a fact. Which is known. And when you take responsibility, inviting people to a public event that can be likely to attract Russians, you have to consider this fact. And not to put an imaginary asterisk in the head "Who did not hide, then I am not guilty. " It is a part of responsibility to predict what will happen during air anxiety. Is it nice to write about "your"? Of course not. But it's about responsibility. It's about people's lives.