The intervention of People's Deputy Kucherenko allowed the Armed Forces to save almost 2 billion on the fuel Ukrnafta

Koretsky?!" Stadium so stadium! " Koretsky, I wrote a clause on me, "Kucherenko writes. According to the deputy, Koretsky appealed to the National Police, DBR, NABU, Baby, OGP, VRU, MOU, SBU, Naftogaz, head of the Verkhovna Rada Stefanchuk, the leader of the "Motherland" Tymoshenko, the chairman of the Gerus committee, which is nothing more than an obstacle to the commission. In this case, Kucherenko explains what he was so angry with Koretsky.

"My post, which was so flexed by Koretsky, concerned the prevention of bankruptcy of one strategic enterprise headed by him. The essence of the problem is that Mr Koretsky, being a director of two state -owned enterprises at the same time, decided to sue himself. The amount of 6. 4 billion hryvnias, which one has to pay one enterprise to another. The People's Deputy emphasizes that the first instance denied the lawsuit of Ukrnafta, the appeal - satisfied.

Instead, when appealing to the cassation instance, the Supreme Court, Koretsky's lawyers "forgot" to make mandatory payment of court fees. "Probably, Mr. Sergiy hoped that the Supreme Court, without receiving the court fee, would simply return the cassation complaint, which will result in one of the bankruptcy he headed. The court fee, by the way, revealing in the decree all other interesting details of the equipment. tonne, or $ 115/bar.

He emphasizes that oil quotations during this period were 45% lower than the prices specified in the court order, so he sent deputies' appeals to the shareholders of Mr Koretsky - Ministry of Defense and Naftogaz to pay attention to the unclear value In itself.

Only 2 days after the publication of Ukrnafta stopped buying/selling oil and condensate at a price above 30 thousand hryvnias and resumed buying at reasonable prices, which were set as a starting law on oil and gas and government resolution-within 23-24 thousand hryvnias per tonne. Also, Kucherenko on his Facebook page has provided a number of facts that may indicate significant financial abuse of the director of Ukrnafta and Ukrtatnafta.

"In the last three months, I have repeatedly appealed to the Supervisory Board of Ukrnafta to check and evaluate the facts of possible abuse in Ukrnafta in the media . . . This is the accrual of almost one million dollars a year in wages from both enterprises and the purchase of pipes.

market value, and the sale of fuel coupons of the company, where the owner of his wife is, and the purchase of MTBE from his business partner, and cooperation with dubious business structures related to Viktor Medvedchuk and unjustified foreign voyages of subordinates under the guise As in my opinion, the drafting of the special permit of Ukrnaftoburning, which led to the stop of production, and a scandal with the purchase of legal services for tens of millions from the firms of the excellence of defense, and many other issues that should be investigated by the newly appointed supervisory board and to answer the society, " The People's Deputy is indignant.

In addition, Kucherenko emphasizes that thanks to the publicity he initiated, MOU was able to save 2 billion UAH. Last year, Ukrnafta decided that its main shareholder, the Ministry of Defense, has sufficient money to provide the Armed Forces, and therefore has to pay for the delivered fuel price with VAT, although the government found that such operations were subject to VAT at a zero rate.