By Natali Moss
Here is why spread this nonsense? It is unclear that headings with such focus are part of the IPSO aimed at creating the illusion of "non-involvement" of the Russian Federation to any consequences associated with its possible use or some terrorist attack with its use in any territory. If you suddenly go wrong and fly a nuclear warrior (directly from Belarus or somewhere, but that charge that was entrusted to Belarus), it will always be possible to say: it is not us, it is Belarus! . .
Yes, they passed, but the button Not us! Everything is like ordinary hebish bases. Such headings are designed to secure in the mind of the Western inhabitant that simple narrative that no responsibility of the Russian Federation for the consequences of a probable nuclear strike. In this murky water (in their opinion) it will be easier to delay the time with an adequate response of the event if everything comes to the extreme . . .
So let's stop using and disseminating information with such distorted content. She did not receive anything from Belarus from anyone, no "acts of delivery-reception" at the disposal of nuclear warheads and did not sign a nuclear state.
USA
Українська
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
