USD
39.52 UAH ▼0.18%
EUR
42.36 UAH ▲0.24%
GBP
49.56 UAH ▲0.99%
PLN
9.81 UAH ▲0.17%
CZK
1.68 UAH ▲0.67%
Ukraine has recently been able to attack and disrupt the most important Russian ...

The Sky-U Complex is blind forever. Why Russian "Red Lines" is a myth fictional

Ukraine has recently been able to attack and disrupt the most important Russian RLS of long -range. Blogger Petro Oleshchuk in this connection resembles the constant fears of the West about the crossing of some "red lines" of Russia, coming to the conclusion: there are no "red lines" in fact. It became known that the SBU units recently impressed the Russian radar station (radar) in the Bryansk region, which controlled the sky at 700 km deep into Ukraine.

The radar worth $ 100 million was amazed by seven aircraft-type drones. The Sky-U Complex helped the enemy to identify Ukrainian means of defeat and supported bombers who attack the Ukrainian border. In addition, the Russian Federation has become less opportunity to detect air targets along the northern border of Ukraine. And today in the American newspaper Newsweek is a publication that, "Ukraine has crossed the red line.

" It is said that Ukraine with the help of a drone attacked the Russian exaggeration radar 29b6 "Container" in the city of Kovilkino of the Republic of Mordovia. This blow, according to journalists, is a possible violation of one of the red lines for the use of nuclear weapons - "breakdown of actions in response to nuclear forces", according to the formulation of the Kremlin Decree, signed by Putin in 2020.

In response, he wants to ask the Americans, "Actually, and what?" Perhaps all these "red lines" exist only in your mind, and even the Kremlin leadership does not remember where it was exactly what the "lines" spent? Just yesterday there was another publication on the topic of "Red Line". "The Ukrainian attack on Crimea will lead to a nuclear blow" - forbes writes that this is allegedly the Ambassador of the Russian Federation personally said I. Mask.

The publication states that this is probably the reason that Musk refused to finance Starlink for Ukraine. And what? What has not happened in the Crimea recently. And where is the "red lines"? It turns out that Musk enrolled in Kremlin propagandists in vain? As in that anecdote - and "red lines" did not protect, and it came out in front of the boys. The concept of "red lines", diligently outlined in the event of Russian aggression against Ukraine, has long lost any connection with reality.

Beat a rocket that flies into NATO airspace is known to be a terrible "red line". Her majesty rocket or his highness Shahed should not be straightened by NATO forces, because something terrible will come immediately. In mystical way, this will affect the bunker grandparents that they will immediately rush to declare the third world. By the way, there recently the troops of individual NATO states have heroically reflected the attack of missiles and "Shahanedov" on Israel.

As you know, the "chew" Iranians have soon been supplied to the Russians for two years. And what if they had to send the Russians to the Shahmed, but at the last moment they thrown into Israel? Isn't the escalation to knock down such a sacred almost Russian shahamed? No one thought in such a way? And in vain. They are engaged in a thoughtless escalation . . . If seriously, in two years of de -escalation, the world received such an "escalation" that once seemed almost impossible.