Putin Zesu will not give: what danger is Trump's plan to manage NPPs of Ukraine

The joint statement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Mike Volts, following the conversation of the Presidents of Zelensky and Trump, states that the leaders discussed the issues of power supply and nuclear power plants of Ukraine. "He (ed. A little earlier, the Trump administration stated that they were of particular interest in discussing the fate of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZPP), which is located on Russia's occupied Ukrainian territory.

Meanwhile, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reported that in a conversation with Donald Trump, he discussed the possibility of US assistance only in restoring the NPP. "I said that only the de-occupation of the station is not enough, because there should be infrastructure-water, technical staff and a lot of steps in order to start making money, electricity for people in one and a half to two years.

Emphasizing that the White House's statements regarding the Ukrainian NPPs are currently general, political scientist Igor Chalenko stated in conversation with focus: "If you start from the statements of President Zelensky, we will understand that it was only about the Zaporozhye NPP and investment in it for a long time.

And quite another - the risks that through their management, Americans will try to supply electricity from the ZPP to the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, which is absolutely not perceived by official Kiev.

" The expert is convinced that the entry of Americans in and ultimately, the smoking of electricity supply to temporarily occupied territories is not Trump's supply, but the requirement of Putin: "The Kremlin seeks to drop the burden of ZPP from" Rosatom ", realizing that the theme is extremely specific and difficult and not the fact that the Zaporizhia. Two options.

Both options, Igor Chalenko thinks, are fully arranged by Putin, because in one way or another generation and, accordingly, energy supply will go for the needs of the Russian Federation. In this situation, the political scientist sums up, Ukraine is put on some stretching. "The picture seems that Kiev seems to be returned to the NPP, but in fact the station will work on the Russian occupier. In fact, there are huge risks in this.

Why? Zaporizhzhya NPP we needed, because it is 6 gigawatt of power and one of the basics of our united energy system. "Atomic" movements around the NPP are really very dangerous, "the expert notes. Analyzing the alteration of Americans in the Ukrainian atomic sphere, the political scientist emphasized: "This is a very good option in terms of minority presence, because we should not forget that we need to build a large number of reactors for replacement for those whose shelf life is completed.

The process of Ukrainian taxpayers. Commenting on the focus the probable American presence in the Ukrainian atomic sphere, political scientist Dmitry Levus emphasized the following: "Since statements regarding the Ukrainian NPP by the White House are heard quite abstract at present, in this situation there is only one thing here: Donald Trump is very stubborn. It is moving in this direction without offering real security guarantees for Ukraine.

And for many other US enterprises that received the Putin rocket-go-goal. Starting from the said, the expert stated that the United States atomic initiatives, which are, in particular, the results of Zelensky's conversation with Trump in a joint statement in Rubio and Volz, are completely invested in the traditional White House policy on "the ubiquitous search for benefits without any obligations.

At the same time, Dmitry Levus suggests, Putin can still agree to return to Ukraine in the case of entry into management of the US side. "But it should be understood that the return of Zaporizhzhya NPP in its purest form will not provide.

Energodar and Russian troops will seem that the territory around the nuclear power plant will not be under the control of the Russian Federation, "the political scientist said, adding that Russia will unambiguously require the supply from the Zaporozhye NPP for the needs of Russia.

Having expressed a certain skepticism about the probable compromise around the ZPP, Dmitry Levus stated that the American presence in the Ukrainian nuclear sector could not be a fuse from Russian aggression in the Ukrainian nuclear sector. Such a fuse, the expert believes, could have a certain effect in a situation where the US military would directly protect certain Ukrainian objects, the United States installed aircraft/about and clearly outlined how they will act in the event of a threat.