Redoed on the threats of the Russian Federation and disgraced: the event did not give Ukraine weapons for the modern war - the media

This was announced by the Strategic Studies of Saint-Endrew University in Scotland Philip Payson O'Braian in his article for The Atlantic. According to him, the United States was much earlier to give Ukraine a long -range weapon. "For too long, the Western Allies of Ukraine have mainly armed this country for caricature for a modern war, not a real war," he wrote. The expert noted that it was because of this counter -offensive of the Armed Forces in the south that it moves so slowly.

Yes, the Ukrainian forces were able to push Russian troops where their defense was the weakest. In order to move more actively, Ukraine needs to either look for such places or create them, struck by the enemy's military infrastructure in the rear. O'Braian stated that Russia's most successful campaign in this war was aimed at intimidating the event. The Kremlin has repeatedly bluffed escalation, and Europe and the US have made loud statements.

However, attacks on Sevastopol showed that Moscow's rhetoric was empty in this case. "The fact that this technique has been successful is a shame, and Western countries should stop being conducted on it," the professor said. The expert said the US should not repeat the same mistake again. Yes, the US military has Air-Earth-Earth missiles AGM-158 that could be transferred to Ukraine. In addition, Washington can transfer Jassm missiles to Kiev, and Germany - Taurus rockets.

"All these weapons would give Ukraine a huge arsenal, which allows to destroy the entire logistics system of Russia in the occupied territories," O'Braian said. According to him, Ukraine should win the war as soon as possible, because it is the best way to limit future destruction and victims. Earlier it was reported that the Pentagon is planning to continue assistance to Ukraine.