Crimea sacred only for Putin

If it were so sacred peninsula, they would probably stand there to death and said that it was very, very important, staying, protecting, and so on. Video of the day this sacred Crimea for Russians is invented, it is important for such pupils as Putin, who see the tools of their own sacralization in this. They say, they took away everything they could, so they are big, powerful, sunsie and should be recorded in history in gold letters. To the average people, believe me, far from this sacredness.

The fact that Russians can take some measures to strengthen their grouping is certainly obvious. And here the conclusion of the American Institute for the Study of War, which, probably, will have to take some of its forces from the front line to protect the occupied Crimea, lies on the surface, it is not necessary to be a great academician to understand what will happen.

But it is even more important for Ukraine to get the weapon that will cover the entire Crimea, not only its western coast, but also the Eastern coast.

Here I am subtly hinted at the Crimean bridge, because it is a strategic object that, in the case of its destruction, will put Russia before choosing: or urgently withdraw all troops from the Crimea, because they will eventually be simply methodically destroyed, though not immediately, But one hundred percent; Or continue this senseless slaughter with the last Russian soldier. It is unlikely that the Russian people will rise to protect the peninsula.

There are two categories of people who run from there. First of all, these are those who came there after 2014. In fact, they are people who, according to our Ukrainian laws, have no right to stay there. I think they understand it perfectly. And they understand that when Crimea returns to the Ukrainian legal field, they will be the first to be deported without even talking. This insight comes very quickly and they run first, make it absolutely right: it is better now than then.

The second category is the people who remained there, but received Russian passports for one reason or another, which are also guilty of what happened on these years on the Crimean Peninsula. Remember how many shouted "now, though the stones of the sky"? Well, not stones, but the cotton flew, so they realize that this cotton will be more every time. So they just escape. I think it is a natural process. And whether the Russian people will rise.

But he will never rise, there is no tradition in Russia to be free people, there is no tradition to feel independent, there is no tradition to understand that you are a master. There is another tradition in Russia: you are a slave, for you the king, your chief, the chief of your boss and so on. In Russia, there can be what we have experienced. Some believe that the issue of Crimea can be solved by diplomatic way. And for this purpose there are negotiations.

So what is my opinion about the alleged statement of the White House about the need for the presence of Vladimir Zelensky in November in Bali, when a great twenty will be preserved and Putin should be. In such cases, I always try to read the source. After I read information about Bloomberg, I went to his site, I did not find a reference to the White House statement. He went to the White House website and did not find any report of such a statement of the White House National Security Council.

Therefore, for some reason, it seems to me that it is more about certain political fantasies that can also be started not just. The very tone of this statement, in such an almost commanding form that "Zelensky should be" is unacceptable. I think it is too early to talk about it, because by November there is a lot of water to escape. Today, the Russian Federation has committed such crimes that it is impossible to sit at one table with the head of this criminal state in principle.

And that is why I understand the position of Britain very well, which indicates that to sit at a table with a war criminal is to legalize it. And it is no coincidence that the prosecutors who are considering, analyzing everything in Ukraine, very clearly and clearly say that the court over military criminals, including Putin, will be very fast, because there is nothing to investigate there - everything is so clear.

I believe that the president of a belligerent state, when the situation changes every day and when there should be full direct control over this situation, it is unlikely that it should fly half the world in order to sit at a table with a military criminal and a murderer. I think that the maximum we can count on is its video message, but in no way personal participation.

Unless this meeting begins, the Russian Federation will agree to sign the act of surrendering all its troops from the Ukrainian territory, compensation of victims, etc. Unless in this case. It sounds a little unrealistic, but I just want to say that other options are hardly realistic. There was no message yet that Putin was not flying there. Does he have fear? Usually, in such cases, the safety of heads of state and governments is almost one hundred percent. I think in this case he will risk.