USD
41.37 UAH ▼0.14%
EUR
48.47 UAH ▼0.01%
GBP
55.95 UAH ▼0.1%
PLN
11.39 UAH ▲0.16%
CZK
1.98 UAH ▲0.45%
These and fashion will not persuade Putin to stop the war in Ukraine, the econom...

To whom is the war, to whom is a solid benefit: 3 reasons why these and fashion will not bow to Putin to peace in Ukraine

These and fashion will not persuade Putin to stop the war in Ukraine, the economist Sergei Makakon is convinced. They do not need it - the war is beneficial at once in several aspects, and in addition, undermines the US position, which is most important for them. From time to time there is a thesis: SI and fashion can force Putin to stop the war. A good picture, but in reality it does not. Why? Because neither China nor for India is a problem that needs to be solved urgently.

On the contrary, they receive considerable benefits from it. Energy factor. Russia sells them oil, gas and coal with huge discounts. It feeds on the Indian and Chinese economy, makes their industry more competitive and allows you to make money on re -export of processing products. Geopolitical factor. The event concentrates in Ukraine, and China and India are quietly building a "Great South" - a coalition of countries that can afford to distance themselves from the US and the EU.

For them, the weakening of Russia as a result of sanctions is not a problem: Moscow is becoming more and more dependent on Beijing and New Delhi. Sanction factor. US sanctions against China or India are not largely related to Russia's war against Ukraine. They follow from American isolationism, Trump's desire to protect the domestic market with duties and restrictions. That is, the war here is not crucial. And here is what it can be interesting and fashion - so it is to undermine American influence.

If Trump continues to negotiate with Putin and says that he "stopped the war", it will raise the authority of the United States. But if the war is drawn and its initiatives fail, on the contrary - US positions weaken, and the south looks more independent and strong. So the logic is simple: why is China and India to remove from the agenda a conflict that plays them in your hand? The author expresses a personal opinion that may not coincide with the editorial position.