By Natali Moss
Trons-interceptors hunt for hostile "Shahda", and each of its destruction is a signal about technological maturity. According to the air expert, the practice of applying FPV-punks to intercept Russian reconnaissance has shown its effectiveness and actually opened a new direction in counteracting low-speed air purposes. "Drones-interceptors are no longer perceived as" something from the future ", but as a working tool in combating the same threat to" Shahmed "or" Orlans "," he explained.
Anatoly Khrapchynsky noted that there is no clear classification Formal scheme. Therefore, the issue of unification is what should come with the next stage. Today we can talk about two main types-multicopter-type interceptors and wings, "says Khrapchynsky. The expert believes that the work of drones-interceptors requires the right focus. The main thing is not how to intercept drone, but to use a" shakh "and like a mini-way. The effectiveness of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces.
It is necessary to move towards automated solutions, where instead of a pilot there is an operator, and instead of manual control-a system that works on the basis of accurate data on the target: coordinates, height, speed, "-says the air expert. He believes that the main thing is to gradually depart from manual piloting, since it requires human resource and one. the list of tools we need to develop at the same time.
USA
Українська
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
