Betrayal or strategic game: what awaits Ukraine after Trump and Putin's negotiations

Trump also had a conversation with President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, who was stated that "it was time to stop this senseless war with mass and absolutely unnecessary deaths and destruction. " The focus gathered the reaction of Ukrainian bloggers, journalists, politicians and political scientists to Trump and Putin's talks.

After the negotiations of the US and the Russian Federation, the head of the Aviation Intelligence Center wrote in Telegram that the end of the war, which will initially offer Ukraine, will be unacceptable and humiliating. "What does it mean? What went into the process of concluding an agreement. What trades of two empires go. We will try to incline to those interests, a compromise that is interesting primarily to these two players.

What is important for us to preserve subjectivity, willpower and willpower and power A polite but convincing tone. Political scientist Volodymyr Fesenko noted that the events in the US-Russian-Russian-Ukraine triangle began to move rapidly, and even stunning. "Someone already expects tomorrow, and someone is in a panic that Trump will get up with Putin and make us to peace on Russian conditions. I advise everyone to calm down a little.

With Putin and especially Trump, tomorrow may be different than today, today, And even more than yesterday. According to him, the main criterion for the further development of the negotiation process is the reconciliation and public announcement of the date, place, format and agenda of real working negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in the US moderation, possibly with EU participation. If this does not, it will mean that nothing has changed in Russia.

According to political scientist Vadim Denysenko, it will be clear within three months whether this round of negotiations will be effective. He urged Ukrainians to maintain common sense, because "dozens of experts are now being distributed on the grounds that Trump's conversation with Putin was longer than Trump with Zelensky. " "Many people write: Trump was the first to gain, so Putin won. It is an idiocy.

Trump's negotiation style with Putin is at least twofold: at the top he is warmly coming personally about Putin. On the lower one - strictly warns about economic blows. What are the requirements of the parties on the table. The People's Deputy from the European Solidarity faction, Alexei Goncharenko, after the talks of Trump and Putin, wrote on the fecesbook that the new stage was officially launched. "As I said during the US election, Trump likes to win.

And now if he really wants to make America big, he should win again. Everything is in his hands. Because if Putin does not lose now, he will not stop," he said. The conversation of Trump and Putin is unlikely to bring peace, only can "put an aggressor like 1937-1938 in Europe in Europe", says political expert Andrew Smoly. "Trump actually legalized an international criminal, a terrorist and a killer - Putin. He brought him to a civilized arena.

He returned to the life of the one who solved the bloodiest of the new era and century . . . Trump repeated all Russian narrative , - he said. Smoly did not rule out that Trump's approach could have a temporary effect of ephemeral peace, but further events can lead to even more catastrophic consequences. The journalist Tatiana Danylenko spoke critical about Trump and Putin's negotiations.

"The Trump's plan looks very simple: Ukraine will give the fossils for losing the territory and will not receive any security guarantees, instead, Carlson will get even more reasons to lick Putin's back. It is powerful," she said. Journalist Oleg Bazaar believes that all the statements of Donald Trump, who were heard the day before, should only be interested in the continuation of assistance from the United States. In his opinion, there is nothing more important to now.

"When asked if the United States will stop helping Ukraine, he (Trump - ed. ) Stated that not, America would continue to assist Ukraine, because" Putin would think that he won, "the Bazaar wrote. Head of the Center for Combating Misinformation Andrew. Kovalenko called "strategic uncertainty in diplomacy" what the United States is doing now. . This approach can be useful in deterring the enemy, maintaining a strategic balance, or forming coalitions. There is a very difficult strategic game.