USD
41.77 UAH ▼0.09%
EUR
48.84 UAH ▼0.59%
GBP
56.71 UAH ▼0.76%
PLN
11.52 UAH ▼0.36%
CZK
1.98 UAH ▼0.5%
Alexei Melnyk Center for Foreign Policy and International Security Center Razumk...

What should you know about the impact on Novofedorivka

Alexei Melnyk Center for Foreign Policy and International Security Center Razumkov are these important points that can be considered as a tactical level of a military action that can have a strategic effect on the war on the war. I am extremely surprised and disturbed by messages, especially if they are duplicated by some Ukrainian contributors or speakers.

The report that, after holding referendums in Russia -controlled territories, there will be restrictions on striking strikes on military objects of the Russian Armed Forces, since from that moment, Russia may see these territories as its own. For me, this logic is unclear. In the context of this Crimea, it is not recognized in the world by any civilized country, as the Russian territory, except those countries that can be counted on one hand.

Therefore, I do not see any political obstacles for Ukraine to have full right to attack Russian military goals in the Crimean Peninsula. It is as a political aspect, which was talked about in the context of possible risks and provocation of Russia to more radical acts on Ukraine. The second is purely in the military plan. I think it's an extremely symbolic step. It is obvious that the decision was made not only by the military but also by the military-political leadership of Ukraine.

And so, in my opinion, this blow for military purposes in Novofedorivka in Crimea can obviously be put at the same level with the drowning of the cruiser of Moscow. These are important moments of war that can be seen as a tactical level of a military action that can have a strategic effect on the course of war. As for the technical side of the case - what they kissed. Would wait for official messages.

I do not exclude that it can be both Ukrainian production weapons and weapons that we have already been put by Western partners. Communication at this time should be adapted to the conditions of war. You can make statements that Western partners will refrain from supplying Ukraine with a distance that can impress targets in Russia. And at the same time this weapon is supplied and continue to say that it is "not our weapons. " This is quite acceptable rhetoric.

It has nothing to do with restrictions on freedom of speech or opacity in foreign policy. It is possible that the goals in Novofedorovka could be not only ammunition or parking, but also radar controls. Because such operations are usually carried out in a complex, as it is a classic of aviation operations, which, first of all, should be supplied with enemy air defense as a means of detecting and impressing air goals. Therefore, I fully assume that it was a complex on their air defense systems.

I do not think that panic will begin in Crimea. But I think that completely logical issues will be asked more actively, which will already sound quite often even on absolutely pro -Kremliv patriotic sites or there are quoted conversations, or the exchange of thoughts on the street. As far as Crimea is protected, as far as the occupying power can be trusted, their statements about the fact that Crimea is under reliable protection.