Ukraine entered the "11" club: what will be given by Sapsan missiles and why for a belligerent country it is a must have

Well, for example, that if our "Sapsan" shoots only 300 kilometers, then it is, saying, Diaosh at once a range to the Urals, no less. Or if the rate of production of our ballistic missiles will not correspond to the level of production on Russian ICSander (ie 60-70 missiles per month), then it is also, they say, it is better not to take at all, but to let money on drones.

But the nuance is that in the modern war, having your own operative-tactical ballistic missiles is the same must have as for a civilized person to dispose of a telephone and a toothbrush. Moreover, there are tasks that can only be solved by their own ballistic weapons. For example - how to quickly "cover" Russian "Isanders", which jumped out of a masked position for volley in Kiev, because there are literally a few minutes here for everything.

You can also rise from a tactical strategic level and fix the one. If the general goal of the Russian Federation strikes is to make every individual's life unbearable, then intermediate - to make sure that we can not organize anything complicated and collective here, for example, the production of domestic missiles.

In total, 11 countries in the world can make their own ballistic missiles, and Ukraine is just in this number (it is necessary to make a correction that France is doing intercontinental ballistic missiles, but again learns to do its own Out). In fact, in order to convey the conceptual grace of what is happening, I used this passage - the emergence of my own ballistics in Ukraine is in particular a big fat middle finger for Putin's applications for "demilitarization" of our country.