Three ways to finish war: As the future of Ukraine, Europe, Europe and China see

But the United Kingdom and France jointly support Ukraine's accession to NATO, when it will be possible (that is, it is still not soon). There are differences in determining the victorious purpose of war. For the general public, there are two verbal structures. States and Germany repeat that Ukraine cannot be defeated. The fresh tandem of the United Kingdom and France insists that Ukraine should win. But these are verbal thimbles.

And what under them? The following can be understood from different analytical materials and journalistic articles. Germany is inclined that Ukraine's missing is if Russia leaves (there invent a diplomatic and legal casuist) Crimea and Donbas, and it will be removed from other occupied territories after 2022. It is close to the Trump Plan (from which he is still baptizing), and perhaps this approach is O. Scholtz intends to discuss with Xi Jinping for the next week.

Franco-British tandem, Britain, first of all, believes that Donbas and Crimea are too much for the aggressor and more correctly leave him Crimea, but he also in some temporary use (until Putin dies), and then the procedure for returning the peninsula should begin Ukraine is something like Hong Kong's return to China.

Accordingly, the British and the French, who have their accounts to Russia, support the supply of so many weapons and finances (even allow our troops - but in words!), So that we can advance and release the occupied territories. And the states and those who profess their approach (unfortunately, most) believe that support for Ukraine should be restricted and dosed in order to gradually roll controlled at the front. Until her leadership matures before the starts.

The problem is that Britain and France will not pull the amount of assistance of Ukraine, which is necessary for realization of their relatively acceptable approach. But the US and Germany are able to do so, but they still do not want to finally spoil the relationship with the Kremlin. And note that V. Zelensky has publicly mitigated his irreconcilable rhetoric with regard to negotiations with Russia and now assumes their possibility after the release of the territories occupied after 2022.

Of course, all this is discussed with China, whose relations with Russia are becoming more and more similar to the relationship of Suzern and Vasal at least in terms of trade balance. And in Beijing, they are guided by the principle: everything that is economically advantageous to China is patriotic and correct, as if cynically it does not look like for "stupid white monkeys. " Accordingly, China considers Ukraine a zone of exclusive interests of Russia.

But he is annoyed that the war is delayed, and the US and Europe are forced to spend their money on weapons for Ukraine, not on the purchase of Chinese goods. That is, China will support the cessation of fighting in the center of Europe on all conditions, no matter how much they will correspond to justice and international law.

The main thing is that this reconciliation was long -lasting and China was able to earn the restoration of the destroyed in Ukraine, no matter who and how these territories will be controlled after peace talks. These are the schedules around us. Ukraine continues to appeal to partners, hope for them and so on. And critically is done to ensure an acceptable negotiation position with both partners and the aggressor at the expense of intra -Ukrainian capabilities.

Non -imperia is convinced and convinces everyone else (for this purpose there was S. Lavrov's visit to China) that in the summer it would break through the front and will impose its conditions of surrender of Ukraine. We need to stand - no matter what Western support will be. Nothing new: everything is decided by the front and the rear that works on the front. And here it is not possible to recognize the situation completely satisfactory even in Teleraton.