USD
41.72 UAH ▲0.33%
EUR
49.18 UAH ▲1.09%
GBP
56.99 UAH ▼0.02%
PLN
11.57 UAH ▲1.03%
CZK
2 UAH ▲1.6%
In an interview with Radio NV, the CEO of Interfax-Ukraine told what the events ...

"While Europe is busy." When Zelensky can meet Putin and exacerbates the confrontation in the fall. Interview with Martynenko

In an interview with Radio NV, the CEO of Interfax-Ukraine told what the events of autumn can further exacerbate the situation between Ukraine and Russia, as well as where President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and dictator Vladimir Putin can meet in November. - I would like to start talking to you with that post at The Washington Post. Now people have divided into those who say that Zelensky was right in everything, and those who think that Zelensky betrayed us all.

For example, the President of Ukraine stated that if he warned that a great war is waiting for us, we must prepare, "there would be a political war in the middle of the country. " Do you understand what he is talking about here? The war between the party's servant and European solidarity? Is this campaign from Akhmetov's channels - Avakov, Razumkov, Gordon and so on? How did you understand it? Video of the day - I do not try to understand every word that was printed in this interview.

I can say the only one. Almost everything that was discussed in this interview, Zelensky said before. The only thing in other words. For example, in an interview with The Economist of the month, two or three ago. Such a noise rose, because this time he found some other words - a little sharp and not fully thought out. It's true. But the bottom line is that we all understand what was happening - everyone who followed these processes from last fall.

There were a warnings of American intelligence, which is not sinless. And we all know it well. And by the way, in the article The Washington Post, not in an interview, it is said that the European partners of the United States, having heard and see these forecasts of American intelligence, mentioned Afghanistan, that intelligence was wrong there. And they assumed that this time they could be mistaken. - In particular, about Iraq . . . - The latter was Afghanistan.

And so all these constant warnings that have been heard from November . . . I, for example, remember the forecast of American intelligence that the invasion with a great deal of likelihood will take place by the end of 2021. Then it was January. Then it was mid -February and so on. All warnings were.

The whole story of a warning that "everyone would have gone if they were warned", I think that we will confuse all our thoughts and actions, given what has already happened, and not if it was to move ourselves at that time. No one, I think, would really believe; No one would go, they would say that the authorities were lying. And the fact that we did not carry out preparatory work, we will really understand then. There should be a large number of people in the army and in local administrations.

What did they do, which of them did? I think this analysis will really be, but after the war. - How much will this topic share society in the future? Who can take advantage of this? - Who can use is a rhetorical question, because it is clear to everyone who is the enemy. The more these conversations during the war, who did something wrong there, [even more so], of course, the Russian Federation and no one else uses.