By Eliza Popova
There can be no such sharp "skew" towards the destroyed infantry in the "Ebale" system. The promotion of enemy infantry is a consequence of their art, FPV, aviation and RTR. They also cover these advancements. Because the uncovered hostile infantry is destroyed much easier and has several times less progress. Destruction of enemy UAV, art, radar, start-ups, CSMs, counter-battering radars, antenna, commanders, team points-only this set of measures can produce results.
And to bet solely to destroy infantry is something from the "Office of Simple Solutions". Unpluent infantry ends faster than covered. And the cover tools are still doing great problems in our rear. Our UAV operators will be forced to constantly roll, and sometimes - and will fall into the environment because they will not work on the enemy rear, because the emphasis will be on the destruction of infantry. The enemy can already work with fiber fiber FPV in Sumy and Kharkiv.
The distance already makes it possible. Yes, it is infrequent, because they are not enough (as we have) large cocks (30-40 km), but can. In this situation, of course, the search and destruction of enemy operators will be priority. And in all similar situations as well. The destruction of infantry is, of course, an urgent and essential thing. But in the systems of assessment of the effectiveness of UAV units, you need to find the golden mean, without sharp "distortions".
USA
Українська
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
