Nuclear weapons - Putin's last trump card: Why does Navalny play a tyrant - Nesvitaylov (video)

Despite the fact that Yulia Navalny's husband was tortured in prison, she lacks the courage on a real protest effect. The event will speak of Putin's illegitimacy, but will continue contact with him because of nuclear weapons in the Russian Federation, the expert says. Only active Russian opposition with weapons in their hands, such as RDC, Legion "Freedom of Russia" or "Siberian Battalion" can change the Putin regime.

After the so -called elections in the Russian Federation, the event will have to communicate with Putin without recognizing his legitimacy. The political observer and expert Maxim Nesvitaylov told this in an interview with focus. According to him, the only truly powerful trump card in Putin remains nuclear weapons.

It is, unfortunately, that makes it politically legitimate in the international arena, because although in some form, it requires communication to preserve the shaky security architecture. "Of course, the event will be publicly not about Putin's legitimacy, but will continue contact with him," the expert says. "Only the Armed Forces of Ukraine and Russian volunteer units will be able to change something in this aspect.

" In the existence of the so -called "Navalny" combat units "Nesvitaylov simply does not believe and considers them a project of the FSB, which must once again scare the Russians. This is an ordinary Russian IPSO, the expert says. "Everyone has long been known that the real Russian opposition is toothless," Nesvitaylov says. "The only thing they have the courage to go and stand at the polling stations.

When looking at Julia Navalny, I give a wonder: your husband was tortured in prison, and You have not yet gained the courage to give up the cowardly paradigm of Russian liberalism. " According to the expert, his calls to "come to the polls and just stand" the Russian opposition only played Putin, creating for him a picture of the mass of elections and voter turnout. The main thing, says Nesvitaylov, would be to get empty sites to show the meaninglessness of the drawn results as much as possible.