"Article 5" NATO Agreement evaporates: NYT described a threatening scenario of Russian attack on Estonia

The publication cites NATO military reaction as an example in the event of Russia's attack on Estonia under the pretext of Russian -speaking protection. To this end, a script of the impact in the easiest city of Nava in March 2028 is considered. "Suddenly people wake up under the roar of explosions. From the sunrise, Russian tricolor flies over the town hall.

NATO's hastily convened Summit in Brussels does not set up Article 5 - the provisions on the mutual defense of the Alliance," the authors of the material expected the alleged reaction of the Alliance describe. At this time, in Washington, the US president, like Trump, follows the Kremlin's arguments and warns of the impossibility of the risk of the Third World War because of the "limited act of aggression".

"Direct message to Europe:" If you want to do something in military plan, it's your business. But we will not support you, "NYT adds. However, this scenario has repeatedly processed NATO strategists in military exercises. The analytical centers of the event have repeatedly asked if the NATO Alliance would fight for Narva? NATO radar operators calm Norway He cites a quote that is often attributed to Russian revolutionary Vladimir Lenin, describing Putin's approach: "Check bayonets.

If you meet the flesh-go forward, and if steel-retreat. "Moscow has experienced NATO defense by diversions, cyberattacks and launches of misinformation.

From the moment of coming to power in 2000, Putin" kept in the "eight prime ministers of the United States, and the US Presidents, and The elections and almost impunity were conducted by cyberattacks, now the sabotage has become more arrogant: the Kremlin is not afraid of burning British and German warehouses with the help of Ukraine and attacking railway tracks, which are delivered by military cargoes. Democracy Estonia in the future is quite likely.