By Natali Moss
There are already a whole sect of businessmen who promote the thesis that they say, why pay to the budget if that money is stolen from there? It is better to finish directly.
Well, dear, for starters, but what about the salary of the military, who will steal it? What about weapons, who will buy it, you? Secondly, on the basis of the analysis of taxes of the gas station networks, I have every reason to claim that the amount of donavs (even if it is even millions of amounts) and does not cover the "optimized" amounts of taxes. In the most daring cases, even 10% does not overlap.
Conditionally, I did not pay 10 UAH to the budget, one hryvnia is a nadonative, and another 50 cents spent on the PR promotion (I am about the prep. Expensive donations come out, aren't you? Therefore, first all taxes to the state, and then decide whether you are ready to help the army "for your" or not. The matter is voluntary (and we look). I am also convinced that the state should monitor tax efficiency in terms of every business employee.
It is the most adequate indicator of the efficiency of the soldier of the "economic" front. If you do not fulfill the standards, then maybe let the problem solve the one who performs? I can only say, again on the example of the "fuel" market that those who are the leader in taxes are the first and in help. What is typical, and in profit too. That is, money is enough for everything - both the state, the army, and the shareholders.
USA
Українська
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
