"Either voluntarily go or expel." Interview with Zagorodniuk - about two things that provided Ukraine with great chances of victory over Russia

- How uncomfortable do the invaders in the south of Ukraine feel after the state of the Antonovsky Bridge, the destruction of bases and warehouses both on the mainland and on the Crimean Peninsula? Video of the day - the invaders feel very uncomfortable. We see it from their movements. We see that they move some forces and means, and we understand that in principle they are aware of what will happen. And the following will happen.

The Ukrainian army will destroy their potential until they are there or it is absolutely dangerous to stay and they will leave voluntarily [territory], as they did with a large number of other areas in Ukraine; Or they will be expelled from there through a counter -offensive. We have both of these options.

Our leadership is done correctly when instead of going on huge losses and victims under a great offensive operation, we destroy the potential so that the Russians understand that they have no chance. Such a new trend in this war is noticed by researchers not only here but also abroad. There is a big chance (of course it is not guaranteed) that this trend will remain. - British intelligence informs that Russian invaders are taking combat aircraft outside the Crimean peninsula.

Do you confirm this? If so, how can it affect the position of the invaders in the south and their ability to strike in the rest of Ukraine? - We have similar information. Probably so it is. First, it is very interesting with Crimea. We all see that we have crossed this psychological border, and we are not only Ukraine but our allies. It was passed quickly and unambiguously.

The statement of Americans that they support the strikes in the Crimea and do not consider it blows in Russia - politically extremely important because the Russians had a plan. We do not know exactly whether this plan is left or not. But he was exactly the following: to attach additional territories, to declare that it was Russia. Further to declare the whole world that the doctrine of the use of strategic safety forces, ie nuclear weapons, is extended to this territory.

Further threat with nuclear weapons in the event of an effort to win the south of Ukraine and, of course, Crimea, but above all new temporarily occupied territories. Crimea has been shown and confirmed that there is no such understanding - Russia believes that it is the Russian Federation and everyone should listen.

That is, if the world believes that it is Russia, it is one story, and if the world believes that it is illegally occupied territories of another country (in this case, ours), then they can speak anything - no one will pay attention to it. In this sense, if they hold this so -called referendum on September 11 [September] and annexed the occupied territories, then they will continue to be inconvenient, because we will still be released and returned under the legitimate control of Ukraine.

And then let them explain to their citizens why the new Russian territories are no longer controlled by the Russian Federation. And of course they will not explain. They will not be able to keep them. So now they have to think about how to get out of this situation. Politically, Crimea was a very important story. And, of course, logistics is military objects that are important to us [destroy] because they were really used for attack on the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the territory of Ukraine.