The second bridgehead. How to get Belarus out of war

And these bridges unite only one thing - their object of attack, depending on a particular situation, is defined by Ukraine. In everything else, they diverge on tasks. Because for the bridgehead in Belarus the object of attack is the Anglo-Saxon region, the Scandinavian region, the northern Europe, and for the bridgehead in Crimea-Balkans, Southern Europe, Mediterranean. The tactical goal of both bridges is Ukraine.

Depending on what tactics will be selected, the time and moment of attack will be determined. Video of the day and from my point of view, the position that, they say, must first go to the northeast border and then resolve the issue with Belarus is absolutely wrong. Because Crimea and Belarus as a bridgehead, on the Ukrainian side must have a identical assessment. And in order to facilitate the methods, methods of impressions of the Kremlin, you need to put a point on the Crimea and on Belarus.

The way the situation around the Crimea now develops is only confirms the correctness of this position. Note how the role of Crimea and Belarus is now interpreted diametrically. And this is only after the Crimea is struck. I am responsible for this that now said. These arguments can also be added that the figures of Sergei Aksenov and Alexander Lukashenko are identical: work schemes, tasks, tactics and the like. In fact, Belarus is actually in the same Crimean status.

It is formally like a state that is in a state of war with Ukraine in terms of international law. Therefore, Ukraine has the right to act in Belarus as it works for Crimea - to strike at points, aerodromes, which are now used as military infrastructure facilities for attack for purposes in Ukraine. By the way, there is one thing that makes us think about what we sometimes mean by the concept of "modern war". Note that there is no front line with Belarus in Ukraine - traditional - with trenches.

Modern types of weapons are used - missile complexes, air defense systems and so on. And this is a thing that testifies to the way of strikes from this site. This means that in particular, the Scandinavian states and Northern Europe should be understood that this method of attack will be applied to them.

Give that I say so affirmatively, because for the current scratching of the head to all those who think that this war will end with a duel of Russia and Ukraine, and that Ukraine will quickly put a point in this story - they will say - they are mistaken. Stretching during this war will simultaneously lead to the fact that it will uniquely develop into regional and then into continental and global.

From the point of view of the current situation, strokes on points in Belarus, where attacks in Ukraine come from, it will be a response to aggression. This will take Belarus from the war. Thank God, the Belarusians by the efforts of Svetlana Tikhanovskaya and the environment began to take absolutely correct actions to form the government in exile, to form future armed forces. And here it is only necessary to synchronize - that military and hostilities and political actions coincide.

This is the care of the European community. In the first stage, Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania should work on this. In the future, this should take care of the European community. Because it is a matter of Europe - the European future of Belarus. And this is NATO. Because Belarus is a issue in Europe's security. It is obvious that these two bridges-both Crimea and Belarus, from the point of view of military-tactical tools have the same function.

Therefore, without solving these two questions, the world uniquely steps to the growth of this war - to regional and then to continental. Judging by what is done in the Crimea, in our military-political leadership there are people who understand that Belarus has the same purpose. Another thing is things that, from my point of view, are both military-technical and political processing in Ramstein format. Because synchronization of actions and participants is important here.