By Natali Moss
The main question for him is why create units from scratch if we then lose the whole zone at the front? In the next "Shkandali" from which the New Year began, under the name "Case of the 155th OMB", personally, I have some questions not by the most publicized "features" )… And in general, the expediency of its formation "from scratch", in the conditions of acute lack of personnel, OVT and other material and technical resources in already deployed crews that have already been introduced (or were introduced) into battle.
Seriously? The number is 155? Even if it is possible that the numbering of parts and compounds in the Armed Forces is through, and there is an urgent need for strategic and operational reserves.
The one who was involved in the organization and planning of real troops is well known - the appearance on the map with the situation with new (additional) "geometric shapes", which denote forming with status, say, "conditionally capable", in no way capable to influence the improvement of the real environment. Rather, they will aggravate it . . .
Even if it is possible that there is some "defined set of troops", which actually conducts fighting on the LBZ, as well as a reserve part of the troops created in it, which, if necessary - or increases in one direction or another The already unfolded grouping, or "rotates" formation that require the restoration of combat capacity, can not grow aimlessly and indefinitely, absorbing people and resources that are extremely needed for the maintenance of LBZ. This is the well -known planning axioms.
USA
Українська
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
