By Eliza Popova
Our team considers it a duty to inform the reader about what is happening, to collect and analyze facts, to resist hostile propaganda. Today Focus needs your support to continue your mission. Thank you for being with us. Literally yesterday I told in an interview "Public" that the use of UABLA-Kamikadze Shahd-136 in Odessa is not appropriate for a number of reasons a raid on the city of these drones has been made. I understand less that the occupiers are driving.
The fact is that Shahd-136, until it produces an algorithm of effective counteraction, can be used in the war zone against the Armed Forces, Nama Walking to block a counter -offensive. Instead, they send one of the UAV through the sea, to Odessa, for what? In order for some of them to fall into the sea during the flight due to refusal? Did the other part knock down the air defense? And those who are left to what? To strike by offsetting missile weapons deficiency? It looks like yes.
The Russians have decided to experiment how effectively they can use ShahED-136 instead of, for example, P-800 Onyx or X-22. It cannot be said that the experiment is unsuccessful, because, in addition to the whipped UAVs, there is a hit, there is destruction and sacrifice among the civilians of the city. On the other hand, this does not solve the issue of creating an element of large -scale terror for the local population or the achievement of a tactical or strategic advantage.
USA
Українська
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
