There is no tank - take "Buggy". Why the Russian army so easily sacrifices its armored vehicles

But it's not. Indeed, all the weapons that the Russian Federation lost in Ukraine for several years has produced "scoop" for decades due to the fact that the whole "big country" lived like beggars. And tens of thousands of pieces of equipment, millions of shells, thousands of missiles, whose task was to reach Lesshsh, was destroyed by the former USSR country. But there is a nuance - and weapons were for another war.

In the modern battlefield, the T-62 tank is not relevant because it has some outstanding characteristics, but because there is a general deficit of technique as a result of exhaustion of both sides. And these old reserves increase the combat capability of units that are severely suffering from the lack of equipment, but not more.

But why did everyone decide that the Russian Federation would go to the T-62 Baltic countries? The Russian Federation understands that weapons in its warehouses are irrelevant. And so it is easy to get rid of it. But at the same time, it produces "Shahda" and other large BB, they actively develop drones, there are experienced drone units, with very different equipment they can use in real fighting, under the work of Ukrainian Reb (which is, I am you.

I will say, such monsters that they are even afraid of their smoking). The rocket production will not go anywhere in them.

Well, what are the chances, to say, from 100 "Abramos" on the side of Lithuania, if there is no tank from the Russian Federation at all, but there will be only drones? Despite the fact that the counteraction to the drone is the experience, the experience of long, bloody and difficult, to protect themselves and their technique from experienced drone - a difficult task, even for experienced ribs. Honestly, I think that tanks located up to 30 km from LBZ will be destroyed by drones in a few days.

Together with everything that will be near. In the meantime, the NATO Army has a counteraction experience, the necessary tools and the ensemble will adjust - there will be nothing to protect. Everyone laughs at these "buggy" and "snags" on which they storm, but there is a logic. On the battlefield, where the initiative of drones, transport can be of two types: yes, it works, because it is a means that, despite the visual "crinality", were born as a result of the experience of war.

What potential opponents do not have. Future, full -time, will already be developed, given the experience. Heavy BMP/MRAP with a regular rebel and an active system of drones and poles, and fast, light "buggy" is the future. And the Russian Federation knows that it needs to be made for the 21st century war. And they have the production of these tools.

The use of missile strikes for UAV correction is the same component that was not enough for the Russian army in 2022, and just because they had problems with confirmation, they were there three times and destroyed Ukrainian air defense and aviation, and then something went wrong. So, other times there will be no such mistakes. System work on our strategic objects under UAV correction is therefore a confirmation.

So yes, the Russian Federation easily ejects old reserves because it understands their inappropriateness. But she gets experience as other means to achieve the necessary goals, and this experience is unique. Only a well -established function of "detachment, as a culture of managing the troops" he has what efficiency has.

That is why it is impossible to evaluate the combat capability of the Russian Federation on the devastation of storage bases, or on the appearance of auto -drills from "insane Max" on the battlefield. It may look "cross" - but it performs its function. And he will also perform in the event of war with any country of NATO. How do the Russians say: "For one whiten two unbroken"? So, the Russian Federation is not just one beaten, that is, the country that has been so grabbed . . .