By Natali Moss
"The enemy is losing nothing: a million there, a million here, the country is big, they will not notice - grandmothers are still in birth. And every fighter is expensive," he said. Yuri invites volunteers to engage in pneumatic mortars, which were widely used during the First World War. "Simply, reliably, silently. The acceleration is smooth-you can use various appropriate ammunition; 80 mm trunk with a pressure of 40 atmospheres throws a mine of 300 m.
There were devices and more powerful-fired 2-3 km," he explained what the benefits of this weapon were . Kasyanov also stressed that the use of mortars will embarrass the enemy: "You never know when and where it will come from. " In the comments under this post, social network users wondered what the efficiency of mortars is compared to the efficiency of shock drones.
Some commentators were inclined to believe that Kamikadze UAV is better than mortars, but Yuri Kasyanov does not completely share this opinion. "If I were a person not a military and would not spend a piece of my life on drones, weapons and war, I would agree with you. But today - no. And the question is not in money. It is not necessary to praise my swamp like that Kulik: drones are not better and no worse than mortars.
And exactly are not cheaper in the amount At the hands, if it is not the hands of a full amateur, " - replied Kasyanov to one of the users. According to the author, drones have a number of shortcomings before mortars, because they are affected Experienced operators in large quantities, and there is a problem with battery charging.
USA
Українська
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
Slovensku
