USD
41.44 UAH ▲0.16%
EUR
43.47 UAH ▼0.37%
GBP
52.1 UAH ▼0.27%
PLN
10.06 UAH ▼0.23%
CZK
1.72 UAH ▼0.48%
The Ministry of Defense of Russia did not explain who and why shot down helicopt...

Moscow's silence. Why the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation is nothing to say about whipped MI-8 and Su-34

The Ministry of Defense of Russia did not explain who and why shot down helicopters and planes in the Bryansk region. Military expert Alexei Kopytko examines several versions of what a moving silence of Russian officials about the mass affair of aviation in the Bryansk region, as well as the total ignore of this topic on the federal channels is not strange. Because which version does not take, to explain the situation without recognizing the tragic degradation of Russian in this direction.

According to ordinary Russian practice, after any obscene incident, a lot of mutually exclusive versions fall into the network until something is born. In this case, the construction of some tolerable lies is complicated by the presence of material residues in the form of declined aviation with a binding to the terrain. Several locations of the fall of aircraft and helicopters were thrown through official and semi -official channels. If generalized, it turns out about the same.

Yellow dots in the picture are the places of crash of helicopters. They are at a distance of about 50 km from the border of Ukraine and about 30-35 km among themselves. Red dots are aircraft crashes most commonly mentioned. The blue point is an alternative version of the fall and Mi-8 and the Su-35 aircraft. There are many variations about the reasons for the disaster. The Russians tried to pump the word "airplane", but somehow difficult.

If someone sat down, where? And how did such different objects in such a square struck from the ambush? In the Russian sources, the version was established that at least one helicopter (above the wedges) is shot down by the "shell" of the shell now already famous Bryansk air defense. They also boiled that this helicopter was shot down by the air-air missile from a "Ukrainian aircraft or helicopter". But this version was too scary.

Those who have a map and a ruler began to think that either the goals were struck from the land of "Ukrainian DRG" or by some long -range air defense means from the territory of Ukraine. Given the distance, the experts believed that it could be C-300 or ominous Petriets.

Even wiser experts began to carefully declare that a mixture of different forms could happen: something struck from the territory of Ukraine, something knocked down the Ukrainian DRG, and then began to smoke frightened Russian pm.

Now the Russians have to choose: 1) their aircraft has rolled up with a friendly fire of their litters (the wine army); 2) they have a hole border and a passing yard 50 km from it (FSB wine); 3) they dumped an attack of aviation from the territory of Ukraine (wine army); 4) They sleeping attacks of land air defense systems from the territory of Ukraine (Vynnya and the Army and the FSB). 5) a combination of options (wine and army and FSB).

And also to make a political decision - or to blame the event? Is silent in a rag? In general, in any case it turns out to be ugly. Therefore, the situation is likely to be locked. Traditionally, all the culprits of the incidents have been destroyed. And all. Interestingly, in Bryansk groups are outraged by the lack of reaction at the federal level. They see this attitude as people with a second grade.