USD
41.82 UAH ▼0.06%
EUR
48.8 UAH ▼0.52%
GBP
56.22 UAH ▼1.04%
PLN
11.47 UAH ▼0.77%
CZK
1.98 UAH ▼0.62%
Even if Trump gives Ukraine Tomahawk missiles (which is unlikely), to fly to Mos...

Not any Tomahawk will fly to Moscow: why Ukrainian drones are more frightening than US long -term missiles

Even if Trump gives Ukraine Tomahawk missiles (which is unlikely), to fly to Moscow - a meager chance, says serviceman Yuri Kasyanov. The Russian air defense is a winged missile - so the Kremlin is a much more scary weapon.

The news of the day that you can hear from every iron (I go in the car, listen to the radio): Allegedly President Trump asked President Zelensky, why did Ukraine not strike Moscow and Peter? To which Vladimir Alexandrovich answered very well: give the weapon, we will beat Moscow. And then discussions began, the assumption that it could be American weapons that would give us the opportunity to beat the imperial capital, in particular in the northern one. In fact, no.

First, we will not be given it, although they write that Trump "considered the" transmission of "Tomahawk" to Ukraine. But no, they will not give - Trump says a lot, but he does little. But even Biden would not give "tomahawki", because one thing is to bomb Russian border with American rockets, and quite another - to attack Moscow and Peter. For the empire, it is like America would attack them directly with nuclear warheads.

This is exactly the same "red line" that is red than red, because such a slap can lead to the collapse of Russia. But even if, hypothetical - to justify the airtime of numerous "experts" - to consider the possibility of transferring to Ukraine "tomatov", then this step will not greatly help us to strike Moscow. First, "tomatov" is not only the missiles themselves, it is an infrastructure.

The Russian analogue of "Tomahawki" - the winged "caliber" missiles are deployed on ships and submarines, and there is still a version on the Iskander automobile chassis, but it has not been widespread. Do we have ships with triggers of "tomatov"? And submarines? And if they were with us, would the enemy want them to be sinking? In fact, any modern air defense system for the drone era was created to combat manned planes and helicopters, winged and ballistic missiles.

In particular, Soviet/Russian air defense. I bet that "tomahawki" will not reach even to the Moscow region, such a dense air defense system created in the empire around two key cities. Maybe some worthless 2-3 percent will break, and then it will lead to the beginning of the Third World War. Ukrainian long -range drones are a much more complex goal for imperial air defense. They have less radar visibility, a smaller heat track and have repeatedly made their way to Moscow and Peter . . .