The new order began on May 9, 2025: As SI and Putin want to return the world during Genghis Khan

A kind of reincarnation of the idea of ​​the Panievrada Land Empire Genghis Khan. In world history, this will be the second attempt of the Telurias to create a ground Eurasian Imperial Continuum, not dependent on marine trade routes. Which in the era of great geographical discoveries brought Asia colonialism and opium wars, and the West - hegemony for 500 years.

Since then, China has realized that the sea routes are very convenient, but internal trading land corridors and cabotage swimming along the controlled shore is reliable. This is how the idea of ​​a new Silk Road, the North Route-South, Northern Sea Road and the Chinese-Pakistan Economic Corridor. After all, the use of key straits and oceanic trade communications is possible only if global dependence on the marine empires - tlassates.

Since the 18th century, the marine empires have always been successfully blocked the rise of continental. As this time, we will see in the next decade. Who else can be involved in the Panubeurian funnel of the Duumviration of China and the Russian Federation? First of all, Central Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and DPRK.

A very rigid correlation between the dynamics of trade negotiations of the United States and China in Switzerland and the asymmetric dynamics of global confrontation between these countries is visible. First of all, on the axis of India and Pakistan (peaceful statements at the start of the Swiss raut and then - disavowing with an intriguing pause). Trump's statements about the Russian case and the EU position are in the same puzzle. Like the situation in the Middle East (Yemen and Iran).

The unsolved aporia "three bodies" does not want to collapse into the problem of "two bodies". In each of the directions there is a rigid geopolitical fight against the transition to clinch. Instinctively, both the US and China realize that only staying in the "three bodies" the "three bodies" gives them a reason to postpone the inevitable solution "for then" without "face loss". This gives the illusion of the opportunity to live in the old format of global consensus for a while.