There is no Internet-there is no danger: why new taxes for average internet providers bring Ukraine closer to the Russian Federation

In Ukraine, there has been a discussion around the activities of small and medium-sized online providers. Today we present one of the thoughts - politician Yuri Gudimenko is categorically against any restrictions on this field. The discussion will be continued.

There, Danilo Getmantsev recently wrote an article in which he stuck on small and medium-sized online providers, from which we "have a low level of security of networks through the import and use of non-certified and substandard telecom-equipment" and "Insecurity of personal data".

And today in the Russian Federation the Internet has reached its logical apogee: a Russian analogue of Hetmantsev in ranking at least Major finally received a switch in his hands and gave a goose in bulk - he just turned off everything at all to them… pits, from Porthab to a telegram, he received the most. The level of network safety and personal data, because there is no Internet - there is no danger, sew the dicpes with pastes.

The logic of Hetmantsev, like his Russian counterparts, was very clear. Our watchman Corgi of the State apparatus wants that there are not hundreds of players on the market, but less - five, but better three, and even better - one, and the state and, preferably, with his person at the head. Then it is more convenient to milk, and the social networks, and in general, it seems to be more convenient.

Because when we have a free market, some hundreds of entrepreneurs, some competition there - then it is crushed and worried. So much so that he writes articles in which he writes about Ripe NCC with a reasonable view, clearly the ass is not reflected what it is. At the same time, we have a really official level of the Internet by price/quality. Really official. First of all, because the cross -paws of Hetmantsev and others have not yet climbed there.