USD
39.43 UAH ▼0.74%
EUR
42.75 UAH ▼0.14%
GBP
49.9 UAH ▲0.29%
PLN
10.02 UAH ▲0.47%
CZK
1.73 UAH ▲0.75%
In recent days, the rhetoric of the West on the war in Ukraine has changed, has ...

Putin thriller. Why the event became more decisive in talking with the Kremlin

In recent days, the rhetoric of the West on the war in Ukraine has changed, has become more decisive and rigid. Journalist Orest Sohar sees in this readiness of partners to discard their red lines, so as not to let Ukraine lose. "Caribbean syndrome". The event launched a new thriller for the Kremlin.

Brussels and Washington suddenly rethought their attitude to Russian aggression: instead of being afraid, they decided to intimidate, showing that they would not allow Ukraine to lose and are ready to neglect their own red lines. Finally… Euro -Atlantists are introducing a new algorithm for the end of the war in Ukraine.

The bunker "felt blood" and makes no sense in any negotiations, so partners try to install him an awareness: the only way to get out of Ukrainian military mire - to simply end the war and remove troops. The campaign began two ago: many politicians and analysts in the west in unison have talked that Putin should be put in place and the civilized world will not allow Ukraine to lose.

The same theses were voiced by both the highest caliber policies such as Scholtz, as well as experts from the Cliber of the American group of the American group in Europe, Ben Goodges. The specifics did not slow down. British Foreign Minister David Cameron said Ukraine has the right to use British weapons in the Russian Federation. And Macron "did not exclude" the straightening of the troops to Ukraine: if Russia breaks the front line and Kiev will turn with this request.

"If Russia decides to go further, we will in any case have to ask ourselves a question about the trips of troops, because Russia is a force of regional destabilization and the threat of safety of Europeans. There is a clear strategic goal: Russia cannot win in Ukraine . . . Otherwise security in Europe is not It will " - Macron.

The US Democrats supported the information relay: though the troops are not equipped with the troops, but they are ready to help money as much as it is needed, because otherwise the Americans will have to fight. "We cannot allow Ukraine to fall, otherwise there is a high probability that the US will have to interfere with conflict-not only our money, but also the military,"-Congressman-Democrat Gakim Jeffris.

The Muscovites responded predicted, imitating the rhetoric of the Caribbean crisis in 1962, allegedly starting nuclear training with the use of tactical nuclear weapons. They will study in the territory of the Southern Military District, responsible for the occupation of the East of Ukraine: propaganda publications hint, say, attacked tactical weapons logistics units, command-staff infrastructure, as well as "bunker infrastructure gateways in the Carpathians.

"The direction of Western troops into the territory of Ukraine will lead to the direct entry of their countries into the war, which we will have to respond. And, unfortunately, not in the territory of Ukraine," - the expansion of the Russian Federation, the state alcoholic Medvedev.

The most difficult question is: how far are you ready to come in the US and the EU, forcing Putin to complete the war? It is important to understand in case the new strategy "to force the Kremlin to stop the war" does not work.

Increasing the degree of international tension, obviously - only one of the scenarios of pressure on the Kremlin, and it is multi -vector: Macron declared readiness to introduce troops in the event of a front failure, while La repubblica names other reasons for the introduction of the Western contingent in Ukraine: for example, official introduction in the war of "bubbles" or even the use of its territory (which is probably in the event of an attack on Kiev).

At the same time, the bunker was prepared not only whips, but also gingerbread: G7 thinks of the hypothetical version of the exchange of frozen Russian assets to refuse the Kremlin from the captured Ukrainian territories, as written by Financial Times.

The best finale for this story will be a quote from Ben Gorses: "The victory of Ukraine is possible with a clear position of the United States and Europe, the effective use of the F-16 and ignoring the Kremlin's nuclear threats, and sometimes-and Washington's advice. We restrain ourselves.