"Risk Aviation": The analyst named the consequences

Reactive artillery, according to Alexander Musienko, can be partially replaced by combat aircraft, but completely Russian troops can not do it. Reactive volley fire systems (RSZV) can be relocated to different sections of the front, and their loss will force Russian invaders to risk aviation. The head of the Center for Military Legal Research, Alexander Musienko reported on the YouTube channel Focus. It is difficult to replace such installations with artillery or aviation.

According to the analyst, the destruction of the Russian RSLS by Ukrainian troops significantly affects the potential of the enemy. "One of the priority weapons," Alexander Musienko explained. Without reactive artillery, according to the analyst, Russia will be difficult to fight. For the occupiers, the losses of RSSUs are provoked for other actions, in particular, more intensive use of combat aircraft, which will increase the risks of destruction from the MSRCs used by Ukrainian troops.

Russia, as explained by Alexander Musienko, puts great hopes for the work of its aviation, because it has the advantage in the sky. In the eastern directions, the occupiers are actively using assault aviation. According to him, they emphasize the power and the battle planes. "The enemy is trying to use his own aviation as much as possible," Musienko said.

The military-political observer, coordinator of the "Information Resistance" group Alexander Kovalenko said on November 16 that Russian invaders have recently decreased significantly, and the process of their destruction will continue. In the first half of November, Russian occupation troops lost 46 installations. He stressed that November could be a record in the destruction of Russian rocket launchers.