Rupori propaganda: As the Russian Federation uses foreign pseudo -experts to spread misinformation

The opinions of "international analysts" are broadcast to both the domestic audience and citizens of European countries. After all, agree, it is much easier to believe the former American intelligence officer than Dmitry Kiselev's conditional.

Why are Russian media increasingly referred to foreign pseudo -experts, why do public persons play Moscow propaganda and how not to get on the Kremlin manipulation hook? The Russian dictator Volodymyr Putin and his dectifier have been successfully killing critical thinking and pumping their citizens with misinformation, investing "right" narratives in the mouth of "Khabeyeva" or "colovyov" for decades. The Kremlin applied similar tactics to European countries.

However, after the start of a full -scale invasion of Ukraine, officials in the West began to actively resist Moscow propaganda. Thus, in early March, the Council of Europe by the EU stopped the broadcasting of Russian TV channels Sputnik and RT/Russia Today. Therefore, Russian propagandists have succeeded in the tactics: promote their messages with the help of foreign "experts" and public persons.

The motives of both groups are different: they can sincerely believe in their right or consciously work on the Kremlin's "Methods". It is not so important, our task is to recognize both and others and learn to resist misinformation. Why Russia pseudoexoxes, after the start of a full -scale invasion of Ukraine, the Kremlin resolved the war in several directions. Russian propagandists seek to discredit Ukraine in the eyes of partners and deprive the support of allies.

This is what Tomash Yankovsky and Mateusz Piskorsky are doing this on the ether of propaganda programs. In Russia, they are represented by political scientists, journalists, experts of the European Center for Geopolitical Analysis, members of the Self -Defense Party. Sounds solid, isn't it? In fact, Mateusz Piskorsky is the leader of the pro -Russian Party "Change" and the founder of the same European Center for Geopolitical Analysis.

Piskorsky often visited the territory occupied by Russia: Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Donetsk and Lugansk regions, where he was an observer in pseudo -elections. Tomash Yankovsky also never hid his pro -Russian views, was a spokesman for the same "Change" party and promoted the idea of ​​the so -called "Novorossiysk". Poland has been constantly helping Ukraine since the beginning of the invasion and supports our desire to join NATO.

Therefore, propagandists try to spoil friendly relations between our states, talking about the neo -Nazism and isolation of Ukraine. The task of the Spanish journalist Raphael Silva is to affirm the idea of ​​"not all so unambiguous" and "Europe has solved the war itself. " The article "10 Errors at the NATO Summit" has published dozens of Russian media, emphasizing that Ukraine is disrupting negotiations, and the West is favorable, so the EU continues to pump our country with weapons.

It is interesting that in the article "Western hypocrisy and cynicism around the war in Ukraine" the author condemns the Kremlin's aggression and says that "this should not happen. " However, in the same paragraph tells about the neo -Nazi regiment "Azov". Outright fakes and numerous manipulations penetrate the entire text. These are attempts to confuse readers and show that "the truth is in the middle.

" As public persons become the Kremlin's "poorest president in the world" - so called the BBC in one of their articles by Expature Uruguay Jose Mukhika. An official known for his humble lifestyle is now known for pro -Russian views. Mukhika word to word repeats the narrative that NATO and the EU have begun war, and sanctions against the Russian Federation are aimed at deepening famine in the world.

At the same time, he claims that the West blocks not only Ukrainian but also the Black Sea ports of Russia. Such statements are false and dangerous, because they create an idea that the aggressor country is actually a victim. In reality, the Kremlin blocks Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea and artificially creates a shortage of food in the world. The EU Supreme Representative on Foreign Policy and Security Policy, Josep Borrel, stated that Russia deliberately uses grain as weapons in the war.

Uruguay has always depended on Moscow's investment. Jose Mukhika, in his cadence, sympathized with Putin and established economic relations between states. The current Uruguay government continues this policy. Yes, the government of the country did not support sanctions against the Russian Federation. Propaganda sites spread the words of Uruguay Ambassador about the interest of developing trade relations between states.

Therefore, another ally of the terrorist state joined Eritrea and Senegal, which support the Russian Federation. In addition, after the start of the full -scale war of Russia in Ukraine, most countries ceased cooperation with the invaders: officials refuse to meet with Dictator Putin, companies leave the Russian market. Therefore, fakements are trying to create the illusion of international support.

Yes, in Russian news you can often find articles about US senators that support the Kremlin's aggressive actions. The propagandist favorite is Senator John Parker. The power -holder has long spread the Moscow fables about the war, resolved and traveling in the occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions. On Russian sites you can also find complimentary articles about senators of Randa Paul and Matta Getz.

However, no matter how hard all sorts of Kiselev and Solovyov, most US officials invariably support Ukraine. This is evidenced by the voting of the US Senate for allocation of $ 40 billion of assistance to Ukraine (for 86, against 11). Later, the authorities approved a resolution calling for a declaration of the Russian Federation by a terrorist state. How to recognize a pseudophich, trust, but check - a rule that should not be neglected.

Before listening to the opinion of the person you see for the first time, you need to spend a few minutes and answer a number of questions. Use Google Find out: 1. Who is this "expert"? Read the biography, determine where and in what specialty the TV specialist studied where he previously worked. Find the speaker on social networks, see a few posts. In this way, you will understand what narratives the author promotes. 2.

Who does the "specialist" work? Answer this question, check to whom the institution has the specified institution and whether it exists at all. 3. How does his language sound? Note whether the speaker says specific facts or uses many emotions and slogans in his language. The second option is an alarming bell about such an "expert". 4.

Why should I listen to him? Is the "analyst" competent in the stated topic? Search other author's materials and make sure the speaker comments on a narrow range of questions. If he talks about medical reform and public procurement, it is worth questioning such a "professional". 5. His statement is true? Voxcheck analysts are working to expose pseudoexers. Your "analyst" may have already been featured in Voxcheck or other media articles by adding the word "fake" to the speaker's name.

If the "specialist" has already spread false information, the search engine is the first to show the results with debunking. 6. Where is such categoricality? Professionals study a lot of research, read analytics, so they draw conclusions with caution. Real experts keep their reputation, care about the audience and usually do not express categorical opinions. In addition, such experts usually cite references to reputable sources to confirm their words.